<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health Premiums &#8211; Group Benefit Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/tag/health-premiums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com</link>
	<description>Your Trusted Advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>New Rules Allow Employers to Reimburse for Health Premiums</title>
		<link>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/new-rules-allow-employers-to-reimburse-for-health-premiums/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-rules-allow-employers-to-reimburse-for-health-premiums&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-rules-allow-employers-to-reimburse-for-health-premiums</link>
					<comments>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/new-rules-allow-employers-to-reimburse-for-health-premiums/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Wolpert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Benefit Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Premiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Reimbursement Arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/?p=7425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Starting Jan. 1, 2020, employers can establish accounts for their employees to help them pay for individual health insurance policies they purchase, as well as for other health care expenses. A new regulation expands on how health reimbursement accounts can be used. Currently, employers and their workers can contribute to these accounts, which can be [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[

Starting Jan. 1, 2020, employers can establish accounts for their employees to help them pay for individual health insurance policies they purchase, as well as for other health care expenses.





A new regulation expands on how health reimbursement accounts can be used. Currently, employers and their workers can contribute to these accounts, which can be used to reimburse workers for out-of-pocket medical expenses.





With these new Individual Coverage HRAs, employers can fund the account workers would use to pay for health insurance premiums for coverage that they secure on their own.





Up until this new regulation, such arrangements were prohibited by the Affordable Care Act under the threat of sizeable fines in excess of $36,000 per employee per year.





This rule is the result of legislation signed into law by President Obama in December 2016, which created the “qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangement (QSEHRA),” which would allow small employers to reimburse for individual insurance under strict guidelines.





The Trump administration was tasked with writing the regulations, which created the Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA).




<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How it works</strong></h4>




Under the new rule, if an employer is funding an ICHRA, the plan an employee chooses must be ACA-compliant, meaning it must include coverage for the 10 essential benefits with no lifetime or annual benefit maximums — and must adhere to the consumer protections built into the law.





Once the ICHRA is created, the employer will a set amount every month into the account on a pre-tax basis, which the employee can then use to buy or supplement their purchase of health insurance benefits in the individual market.





The law allows employers to set up as many as 11 different classes of employees for the purposes of distributing funds to ICHRAs. The employer can vary how much they give to each different group. For example, one class may get $600 a month per single employee with no dependents, while members of another class may receive $400 a month.





The allowable classes are:





<strong>Full-time employees</strong> — For the purposes of satisfying the employer mandate, that means a worker who averages 30 or more hours per week.





<strong>Part-time employees</strong> — Like the above, the employer can choose how to define what part-time is.





<strong>Seasonal employees</strong> — Workers hired for short-term positions, usually during particularly busy periods.





<strong>Temps who work for a staffing firm</strong> — These employees provide temporary services for the business, but are formally employed through a staffing firm.





<strong>Salaried employees </strong>— Staff who have a have a fixed annual salary and are not typically paid overtime.





<strong>Hourly employees</strong> — Staff who are paid on an hourly basis and can earn overtime.





<strong>Employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement</strong> — Employees who are members of a labor union that has a contract with the employer.





<strong>Employees in a waiting period</strong> — This class would include workers who were recently hired and are in their waiting period before they can receive health benefits (in many companies, this is 90 days).





<strong>Foreign employees who work abroad</strong> — These employees work outside of the U.S.





<strong>Employees in different locations, based on rating areas</strong> — These employees live outside the individual health insurance rating area of the business’s physical address.





<strong>A combination of two or more of the above</strong> — Businesses can also create additional classes by combining two or more of the above classes.





The rules for ICHRAs are as follows:




<ul class="wp-block-list">
 	<li>Any employee covered by the ICHRA must be enrolled in health insurance coverage purchased in the individual market, and must verify that they have such coverage (as mentioned above, that coverage must be ACA-compliant);</li>
 	<li>The employer may not offer the same class of workers both an ICHRA and a traditional group health plan;</li>
 	<li>The employer must offer the ICHRA on the same terms to all employees in a class;</li>
 	<li>Employees must be allowed to opt out of receiving an ICHRA;</li>
 	<li>Employers must provide detailed information to employees on how the ICHRA works;</li>
 	<li>Employers may not create a class of employees younger than 25, whom they might want to keep in their group plan because they’re healthier;</li>
 	<li>A class cannot have less than 10 employees in companies with fewer than 100 workers. For employers with 100 to 200 employees, the minimum class size is 10% of the workforce, while for employers with 200 or more staff, the minimum size is 20 employees;</li>
 	<li>While benefits must be distributed fairly to employees that fall within each class, each class can be broken down further by age and family size. That means employees with families can be offered a higher amount per month and rates can be scaled by age.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/new-rules-allow-employers-to-reimburse-for-health-premiums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Rule Would Allow Employers to Reimburse Staff for Health Premiums</title>
		<link>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/proposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiumsproposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiums/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiumsproposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiums&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiumsproposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiums</link>
					<comments>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/proposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiumsproposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiums/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Wolpert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Benefit Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Premiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Reimbursement Arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/?p=6690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Trump administration is moving ahead with new regulations that would make it easier for employers to enter into health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) with their employees, a practice that can be severely penalized under the Affordable Care Act. Under the proposed regulations – issued by the departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Trump administration is moving ahead with new regulations that would make it easier for employers to enter into health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) with their employees, a practice that can be severely penalized under the Affordable Care Act.</p>



<p>Under the proposed regulations – issued by the departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services – employees would be allowed to shop and pay for their own coverage using tax-free HRAs that are set up by their employers.</p>



<p>Under the proposed rule, employers that offer traditional health insurance would be allowed to fund an HRA with up to $1,800 per year. The money in the HRA could be used to reimburse employees for certain medical expenses, as well as for premiums for health insurance policies or stand-alone dental benefits.</p>



<p>And offering HRAs used to help employees pay for individual health insurance premiums would count as an offer of coverage to satisfy the employer mandate under the ACA.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">More options, lower costs</h4>



<p>Administration officials said expanding HRAs would give employees more options in terms of health coverage, and it also would reduce costs and administrative burdens on employers.</p>



<p>If enacted, the new regulations would undo Obama administration guidance (as it was not actually written into the regulations) barring employers from paying into HRAs to help workers pay for health insurance premiums from policies they buy on the open market or on government-run exchanges.</p>



<p>Companies that were caught in such arrangements faced a hefty fine of up to $36,000 a year.</p>



<p>The employer mandate would stay intact but the proposed rule would allow an employer to satisfy the mandate by funding HRAs for its workers. Under the employer mandate, organizations with 50 or more full-time or full-time-equivalent employees are required to purchase “affordable” health coverage that covers at a minimum 10 essential benefits as outlined under the law.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">HRAs must be affordable</h4>



<p>The key is that the HRA must also be affordable under the proposed rules. That would depend in part on the amount the employer contributes to the HRA.</p>



<p>The agencies proposing the new regulations said in an announcement that they would provide further guidance on the HRA-specific affordability test.</p>



<p>Funds going into HRAs would be exempt from federal income and payroll taxes. Additionally, employers would be able to deduct the amount they put into HRAs from their taxes.</p>



<p>The proposed rule would also require employers that offer HRAs to allow a worker to opt out and instead claim a federal premium tax credit to purchase coverage on the individual exchanges.</p>



<p>This is the early part of the rule-making. The proposed regulations will have to go out for public comment before final rules are written and implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gbsbenefitsgroup.com/proposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiumsproposed-rule-would-allow-employers-to-reimburse-staff-for-health-premiums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
